Gordon F. Belcher

Gordonは、法律事務所と企業での豊富な経験を有し、特許出願の新規出願と権利化、特許性、特許の有効性、特許侵害、営業秘密保護および不正流用に関する見解、eディスカバリー文書のレビューを含む訴訟サポート、全世界における知的財産権の獲得と拡大に関する相談、他者の知的財産権の侵害を回避するための相談などの知的財産法に関する実務を扱っています。

Core Competencies

• Patents
• Trade Secrets
• E-discovery

Presentations & Publications

• Co-author, Comments Regarding the Impact of the Proliferation of Artificial Intelligence on Prior Art, the Knowledge of a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art, and Determinations of Patentability Made in View of the Foregoing (submitted to USPTO on July 29, 2024 in response to Fed. Reg. Announcement) www.regulations.gov/comment/PTO-P-2023-0044-0071
• Co-author, Comments on Unlocking the Full Potential of Intellectual Property by Translating More Innovation to the Marketplace (submitted to USPTO on May 12, 2024 in response to Fed. Reg. Announcement) www.regulations.gov/comment/PTO-C-2024-0004-0016
• Co-author, Comments Regarding Artificial Intelligence and Inventorship (submitted to USPTO on May 15, 2023 in response to Fed. Reg. Announcement). www.regulations.gov/comment/PTO-P-2022-0045-0065
• Co-author, Comments on Director Review, Precedential Opinion Panel Review, and Internal Circulation and Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions (submitted to USPTO on October 18, 2022 on behalf of NYC Bar Association in response to Fed. Reg. Announcement). https://downloads.regulations.gov/PTO-P-2022-0023-4305/attachment_1.pdf
• Co-Counsel, Amicus Brief to U.S. Supreme Court for Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., et al. (Fed. Cir. 2020) (submitted March 1, 2021 on behalf of NYC Bar Association). https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-440/170388/20210301124109230_20-440 Minerva Surgical v Hologic Inc Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party.pdf
• Credited for assisting (research and writing), Thomas L. Creel, Esq., In a patent claim, does ‘one’ or ‘a’ of something mean only one?, Westlaw Today (December 11, 2020). https://today.westlaw.com/Document/I429f5f233bcc11ebbea4f0dc9fb69570/View/FullText.html?contextData=(sc.Default)&transitionType=Default&firstPage=true
• Co-author, Comments on Discretion to Institute Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (submitted to USPTO on December 3, 2020 on behalf of NYC Bar Association in response to Fed. Reg. Announcement). https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1232020NewYorkCityBarAssociation.pdf
• Credited for assisting (research and writing), Thomas L. Creel, Esq., Arbitration Questions to Consider in Patent License Disputes, Law360 (May 1, 2019). https://www.law360.com/articles/1155486?copied=1
• Credited for assisting (research and writing), Thomas L. Creel, Esq., The Pros and Cons of Arbitrating Patent Disputes, JAMS Alternative Dispute Resolution Blog (January 28, 2019). https://www.jamsadr.com/blog/2019/the-pros-and-cons-of-arbitrating-patent-disputes
• Co-author, Comments on Determining Whether a Claim Element is Well-Understood, Routine, Conventional for Purposes of Subject Matter Eligibility (submitted to USPTO on August 20, 2018 on behalf of NYC Bar Association in response to Fed. Reg. Announcement). https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/eligiblity2018comments_a_nycb_20aug2018.pdf